Saturday, January 26, 2019

Governor Newsom to sue Huntington Beach. (Press Release)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Contact: Governor's Press Office
Friday, January 25, 2019(916) 445-4571

In the Face of Unprecedented Housing Crisis, California Takes Action to Hold Cities Accountable for Standing in the Way of New Housing

State will file first-of-its-kind lawsuit against a city, Huntington Beach, for willfully standing in violation of state housing law

 Governor Newsom: “California’s housing crisis is an existential threat to our state’s future and demands an urgent and comprehensive response”

SACRAMENTO -- Governor Gavin Newsom announced today that the state is taking first-of-its-kind legal action against a city for standing in the way of affordable housing production and refusing to meet regional housing needs -- local actions that harm California families’ ability to find affordable places to live and drive up housing costs for everyone. The Governor approved legal action against the City of Huntington Beach for willfully refusing to comply with state housing law, even after extensive attempts to offer partnership and support from the California Department of Housing and Community Development.  The Attorney General will file suit against the city today.

Californians spend more of their income on housing costs than residents of almost any other place in America, and demographic data shows these huge costs are driving families further away from their jobs, and often out of the state. Meanwhile, a number of recent studies have warned that the state’s tight housing market will constrain future economic growth and deepen economic inequality.

“The state doesn’t take this action lightly, “said Governor Newsom. “The huge housing costs and sky-high rents are eroding quality of life for families across this state. California’s housing crisis is an existential threat to our state’s future and demands an urgent and comprehensive response.” 

In his first budget, Governor Newsom proposed extraordinary support and assistance for cities to create the conditions for new housing production and help meet local housing needs. His budget allocates $500 million for incentives for cities that allow for new housing production and $250 million to provide technical assistance for cities to responsibly ramp up zoning and permitting processes. The Governor’s budget also includes another $1 billion in other funding for housing construction.

“Cities and counties are important partners in addressing this housing crisis, and many cities are making herculean efforts to meet this crisis head on,” said Governor Newsom. “But some cities are refusing to do their part to address this crisis and willfully stand in violation of California law. Those cities will be held to account.”

California cities and counties are required by law to draft and adopt a housing plan that meets the needs of the broader region and its economy. Under law, the city’s housing plan must accommodate a fair share of the regional housing needs and provide zoning that encourages development of housing that is affordable to the city’s residents across all income levels, including affordable housing and middle-income housing.  

In 2015, the Department of Housing and Community Development, the agency charged with tracking cities’ progress in meeting these housing goals, found Huntington Beach’s housing plan was out of compliance with state law. After adopting a plan that met state standards in 2013, the city amended their housing plan and significantly reduced the number of new housing units able to be built -- moving the city out of compliance with state housing law. Despite the Department of Housing and Community Development’s repeated efforts to work with Huntington Beach to bring its housing plan into compliance, the city council ultimately rejected a proposed amendment to build additional units. 

The state’s complaint against Huntington Beach seeks to ensure housing equity, requiring the city to amend its housing plan to bring it into compliance with state law by planning for the development of additional housing units that are accessible to residents of all income levels.

AB 72, which took effect January 1, 2018, allows the state to revoke a city or county’s existing housing plan compliance and to refer potential cases to the state Attorney General’s Office for litigation. The suit against Huntington Beach will be the first such case.

Ain’t no more work at the HuffPo Clickbait factory

LAFCO recommendations for Marinwood CSD in 2006

Friday, January 25, 2019

This is what we are fighting for.

How the Mighty have Fallen by following Regional Government




Susan Adams Marin County Supervisor,ABAG Vice President voted out of office when the people of her district discovered that she recommended her community for a Priority Development Area and then denied it.  He duplicity to the voters was repaid with recall campaign and landslide loss in 2014.


Steve Kinsey, Marin County Supervisor, MTC President resigned in 2016 while the subject of massive breach of ethics for 200+ meetings with developers while also serving on the California Coastal Commission. He was sued for $5 million dollars but settled for a lower amount with taxpayers footing the bill. 


Jake MacKenzie,  Rohnert Park Councilman current MTC chairman ,  de throned on 1/22/2019 after his fellow councilpersons discovered that he had failed to report about the CASA Compact which may cost his community $15 million dollars in housing funds.  He then did not report back the concerns of his community to ABAG where he also serves on the CASA Committee.

But wait, there's more....



The president of ABAG who signed Plan Bay Area in 2014, Mark Luce, Napa County Supervisor lost his re-election bid in 2016 for unknown reasons. He is in Africa on a journey of self discovery at last report.


LESSON: Represent the best interests of your local community and be honest and transparent in your dealings lest you "get the boot". Serving only regional interests is the shortest path to political oblivion.

"Jake MacKenzie's Mighty Fall from Grace" is just a first of many stories to come


INTERVIEW: Jake Mackenzie Responds To His Ouster From Two Regional Transportation Boards



Photo courtesy of Jake Mackenzie.

Rohnert Park City Councilman Jake Mackenzie was stripped of his position on the SMART Train Board and the Sonoma County Transportation Authority. He begins by describing exactly what he believes happened, his disappointment over the results of the proceedings, the reason he believes he was shut out from his longtime positions in transportation, how he responds to the notion that they may have wished for a fresh approach to the position, and how he plans to work with the Council going forward:
 listen HERE

Editor's Note: The Jake MacKenzie ouster is being picked up by the media.  Apparently the videos I created about his statements in favor of the CASA compact made the rounds.  Not only did he keep the CASA compact hidden from his fellow council people, he also refused to convey the sentiments of the council.   He is a corrupt, out of touch politician who has forgotten what public service means.  Referring to himself as "William Wallace" is a laugh.  William Wallace fought the corrupt King Edward I for Scottish independence and paid for it with his life.  If anything, MacKenzie is more like the toady loyalists to the Crown that betrayed their countrymen for the taste of power.  B.S. with a Scottish Brogue.

Payback is a b*tch. Rohnert Park de thrones Jake MacKenzie.

Jake McKenzie was passed over for nomination to the Sonoma County Transportation Commission and the SMART board. at the January 22, 2019 Rohnert Park City Council meeting.  Jake MacKenzie, long time council member and  chairman of the MTC CASA Compact committee shocked the community on 1/8/2019 when he approved the CASA compact which among other things could cost Rohnert Park 15 million dollars per year.   He did not inform his fellow board members during the two years of negotiations at MTC.  Although fellow council people tried to cover up their disappointment,  all agreed unanimously that he abused his responsibility to Rohert Park citizens. This marks the end of an era in Sonoma County regional politics for Jake MacKenzie even though he will still serve his term as director for MTC.


You may recall the councils negative reaction to Jake MacKenzie "forgetting" to regularly inform his board during the 2 years of negotiations of the CASA compact.  The council was very upset...


Thursday, January 24, 2019

KQED forum on the CASA Compact

Major Housing Plan Gets Approval from MTC, Association of Bay Area Governments


52 min


A worker stands on the roof of a home under construction at a new housing development on November 17, 2016 in San Rafael, California. (Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
Since the summer of 2017, the Committee to House the Bay Area, known as CASA, has been tasked with creating a broad legislative package to address the Bay Area's housing crisis. The committee's ten-point plan has now been endorsed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). While not law, the group hopes its recommendations will drive major action by the California State Legislature. The plan calls for a cap on rent increases, more housing near public transit and a new regional agency with the power to tax, among other things. We'll hear from supporters and critics of the plan.
Guests:
Guy Marzorati, reporter, KQED's California Politics and Government Desk
Michael Covarrubias, chairman and CEO, TMG partners; co-chair of CASA
Susan Kirsch, founder, Livable California
Paola Laverde, chair, Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

The First Amendment to the Constitution: My Open letter to Marinwood CSD and Commission members.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


My Open letter to Marinwood CSD and Commission members:  



Last night during public comment I quoted from this paper on Public Speech and the First Amendment and was threatened with arrest. The claim was because I had stated the obvious point that email is free and addresses are freely obtainable in public records, there is no reason to prevent communication by email, post mail or personal delivery when all else fails. 

We can do better and I hope that you will read the linked document.  The public needs accountability from the Marinwood CSD and the First Amendment protects our right to redress the government.  

As far as I know, Marinwood CSD is the only public agency that prohibits direct contact with its elected and appointed officials.   Secret government is simply not in the best interest of democracy.   I am frankly quite surprised that the Marinwood CSD would even consider such as provision as this:

ARTICLE VIII – PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
As an advisory body to and appointed by the Board of Directors, communications and correspondences between the Commission or individual Commissioners and members of the public shall be restricted to open and public Commission meetings. Correspondences from the public to the Commission or individual Commissioners may be sent to the District Manager who shall then forward said correspondences to the Commission or individual Commissioners as appropriate and allowable. In such instance, a Commissioner may request an item be placed on a future meeting agenda for further discussion and consideration of the Commission.
Should Commissioners receive correspondence or any other form of communication directly from members of the public, at their discretion they may inform the Commission at the next Commission meeting and request an item be placed on a future meeting agenda for further discussion and consideration of the Commission.

=================

What if the public wishes to make written comments that are critical of the board or staff members?  Will this be deemed "important" to relate to the public body?   This provision is censorship plain and simple.

I believe most people still understand free speech is a basic right in the Constitution. I recommend that you revisit you knowledge of this subject.  Marinwood CSD must adhere to the law.





Legal white paper on the limitations of Public Speech and the First Amendment.  



No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.