NEWS REPORT HERE
Saturday, May 30, 2015
Friday, May 29, 2015
|Home Tax Exemptions are not "subsidies". They simply allow the homeowner to keep more of their earnings. Government "subsidises" are the direct transfer of wealth from one taxpayer to another. Very different.|
Thursday, May 28, 2015
NEWS REPORT HERE
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Here is the full unedited video of the Muir Woods Transportation Meeting held at Mill Valley Community Center on May 26, 2015. Congressman Jared Huffman created a task force to study the various ways that the National Park Service can increase visitors to the park without causing major parking issues and traffic problems at Tam Junction.
According to Congressman Huffman, a consensus was reached with a reservation/shuttle bus system that allows the park to modify visitation according to seasonal and weekly demand. Each panel member expressed their support of the plan with major caveat, "the devil is in the details".
The final report was released to the public only hours before the event, denying the public's opportunity to examine the "devilish details". The National Park Service has a major credibility problem in Marin after they were found falsifying scientific data in their case against Drakes Bay Oyster Company. It may be a generation or more before people are willing to accept the integrity of the National Park Service in any public negotiation. (Incidentally, non of the NPS employees were fired after the Drakes Bay Oyster Company incident. Most were promoted.)
On the surface, I agree that the plan make sense. It is a reasonable balance between stewardship and access. But the "Devil is in the Details" . Watch for the final plans to emerge. There may be significant changes yet to come.
No Congressman Huffman. No one is suggesting conspiracies. We have proof that the NPS has not always been a trustworthy partner to negotiations. Just ask Kevin Lunny.
Correction: Above is the first hour of the meeting. Here is the 2 hour video:
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
Plan Bay Area 2040: Join the Conversation
May 19, 2015
Open house participants are encouraged to vote on their top goals for the plan via sticky dots. Photo by Karl Nielsen.
Public outreach for Plan Bay Area 2040 is in full swing this spring, with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) staging open houses in each of the nine Bay Area counties through May 28. Using sticky dots, participants vote on their top goals for the plan, choosing from among seven options: climate protection, adequate housing, healthy and safe communities, open space and agricultural preservation, equitable access, economic vitality, and transportation system effectiveness.
If you missed the meeting in your county, you can still participate virtually, via the online Plan Bay Area Open Forum, which will be active through May 31, 2015. The public comments will feed into the “Goals and Targets” that will form the foundation for this iteration of the region’s long-range plan, which is updated every four years.
Marin County: Thursday, May 28, 2015, 5 p.m. to 7 p.m., Marin County Civic Center Cafe, 3501 Civic Center Drive, 2nd Floor, San Rafael
|Supervisor Steve Kinsey, Marin Commissioner for MTC (our only one)|
Gentrification is often thought of a problem of poor neighborhoods. I disagree. It is everyone's problem when government is used for private and ideological ends to strip to enrich a few. This is the EVIL of the redevelopment schemes of Smart Growth Planners. Like an invading colonists, they are intent on transforming the landscape into their own imagined "Smart Growth" cities and villages. Local communities be damned.
Shouldn't the citizens have a voice in their future? Why should unelected bureaucrats and regional planning bodies be allowed to destroy neighborhoods? Natural changes occur in neighborhoods in response to economic pressures and changing tastes. When this happens it can be a good thing. But when government writes the rules, provides special incentives, tax breaks and direct grants, it is using government to enrich a small segment of development interests over the local population.
This is happen all over the Bay Area including the Mission, China town, Oakland, Berkeley and of course Marin. In Marin City, a whirlwind of change threatens to level the tight knit community in favor of market rate housing (i.e. government imposed gentrification). The residents of mostly renters will become the displaced victims of this government mandate. Likewise in suburban neighborhoods, tax subsidized big box apartments will be thrust on the community, straining schools, traffic and the local tax base.
We will Save Marin Again.
Monday, May 25, 2015
Sunday, May 24, 2015
This was extremely clever, and a pivotal moment in the development of common law. Remember the pyramid of land holding and obligations? William decreed that, instead of relying only oaths, he would personally enforce property rights as owner. In the past, if a dispute arose between two property holders, they (and allies) settled it themselves. As owner of the land, though, William promised to use his armies to make sure that those who swore fealty honoured their oath. His superior right of ownership would let him enter land and end the dispute. Although you might suspect that English lords were offended when the king said, "Your land is now owned by me," it wasn't really too different than what they already knew. While William owned the land, land holders would still enjoy most of the rights they had before. For those already high on the food chain, this was a good deal: As long as they kept their oaths of fealty to the king, they didn't have to worry about those underneath them. The king would back them. For William it was political gold, because, as owner, he could reassign property. Just like a landlord can evict a lousy tenant, the king could "evict" a rebellious baron or earl. If you were the king's friend, and I was the king's enemy, the king could simply turn to you and say, "Kent's lands are now yours. If you need my help removing Kent, I'll gladly send in my troops." Now, I would be lying if I suggested that everyone was immediately happy with this arrangement. But William became Duke of Normandy at age seven, and by the time he took the English throne, he had lived through three murder plots and had 31 years' experience putting down rebellions in France. Those lords who didn't like the new arrangement faced William's sword and having their lands divided among William's supporters.
King William the Conqueror
Editors Note: Just like the Kings of old, planners want to diminish the rights of private property rights in favor of regional planning and central government. This is at odds with our Constitutional liberties and a dangerous trend for democracy.
|Skeptical Citizens are not buying SB-1- California's Redevelopment Land Grab Legislation in 2013.|
The Measure was tabled but new MORE POWERFUL land grab legislation passed this year HERE
|The colorful Jimmy Fishbob Geraghty watches over the proceeding.|