![]()
California Lawmakers Continue to Undermine Property Rights: Urban renewal rears its ugly head
again in the Golden State
Article
by Stephen Greenhut
California's 1940s-era urban-renewal policy, "redevelopment," is
coming back - only less so in some ways but more so in others.
California's redevelopment law
was designed to revive inner-city neighborhoods by giving city planners extra
powers to invest tax dollars and direct development decisions in areas that
were deemed to be blighted. It morphed into a financial sleight of hand,
whereby officials subsidized auto malls and hotels to divert tax revenues that
would go elsewhere.
Property-rights activists
loathed redevelopment because it gave cities an excuse to take
property via eminent domain and give it to developers who had
"better" plans for the property. Anything eyed by these agencies,
critics said, became "blight." Read the full article here
SB-1
(Redevelopment
Resurrected)
This
bill is a THREAT to Rural and Suburban property owners
Expanding
the Definition of
BLIGHT
Declares
suburban and rural
lifestyles-which it terms "inefficient land use
patterns-as "blight."
Declaring suburban and rural land use a "blight" has
appalling and stunning legal and political implications. How does it
feel to have a target on your back from these people?
Creates
mini-ABAGs (redevelopment agencies) not controlled by cities and towns.
Allows eminent domain and funding power to assemble and fund massive high
density housing projects in suburban downtowns.
WHY CARE?
If you
own property in an area that the government wants to upzone (such as property
in a PDA), they can arbitrarily take your property and put it with
others so they have enough area to develop
high
density housing near mass transit. It also provides permanent funding
for
PLAN
BAY AREA
|
|
Citizens
MUST oppose this law
![]() |
A blog about Marinwood-Lucas Valley and the Marin Housing Element, politics, economics and social policy. The MOST DANGEROUS BLOG in Marinwood-Lucas Valley.
Monday, August 26, 2013
The most important threat to your community from Sacramento lawmakers today
"What is the Meaning of this City?"
![]() |
| T.S. Eliot 1888-1965 Writer, Poet, Playwright and Social Critic |
"When the Stranger says: 'What is the meaning of this city? Do you huddle close together because you love each other?' What will you answer? 'We all dwell together to make money from each other'? or 'This is a community'?"
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Our People's History, not part of Common Core.
![]() |
| Osceola, Seminole leader. |
History, not part of Common Core
01ThursdayAug 2013
Hollywood has perverted the history of Native Americans for decades, even more than a century. The movie industry is filled with images of “Indians” in war paint and riding across the plains slaughtering people and stealing horses. ALL of this is nothing more than box office appeal.
I was told most of my life that the history of our people has been passed from generation to generation by “word of mouth” by the elders. I want to pass some of this history along to you, but in this case it will be in writing.
The Seminole Tribe of Florida bears a motto of never being defeated or signed a treaty with the United States of America. The Seminoles of Florida rightly own and operate lands completely governed by a Tribal Government. They provide their own police department, have schools that out perform the public schools of the state. The Tribe purchased Hard Rock Cafes and Casinos and turned the tribe into one of the richest in the world.
But we are here to talk about history:
The Seminole wars lasted for years and the attempt to destroy the tribe was led by many army generals and at least one President. The tribes knowledge of jungle warfare was the reason for the development of today’s guerrilla warfare tactics. Not only the jungle warfare tactics in the swamps and forests of the Southeast though, but the hit and run tactics if the plains tribes was very successful. So successful in fact that the Army had to resort to trickery to gain any victory as evidenced by the great warrior Osceola of the Seminole tribe.
Osceola’s capture, under a controversial flag of truce offered by Gen. Thomas Jessup, remains today one of the blackest marks in American military history. A larger-than-life character, Osceola is the subject of numerous myths; his 1838 death in a Charleston, S.C. prison was noted on front pages around the world. At the time of his death, Osceola was the most famous American Indian.
Another myth perpetrated by Hollywood is the taking of scalps by the plains tribes. This practice was learned from white Indian fighters in Texas. The “counting coupe” as described by Hollywood did not mean scalping of enemies. This practice was initially the mere touching the dead body of a fallen brave. It was believed that if you touched the body of a fallen enemy, his bravery and spirit would transfer to you.
In a particularly bloody battle in Northern Texas, several “Indians” were killed and the white mercenaries involved scalped the bodies to take back as proof for payment. Needless to say this incensed the warriors that returned to collect the bodies of their fallen comrades. So the practice was performed in retaliation in future raids.
If you get the chance, please go to the Sand Creek Battleground on Colorado. The history here is that portions of the 7th U. S. Cavalry had surrounded a settlement of “Indians” at Sand Creek just before dawn. At dawn the soldiers attacked before anyone was awake and slaughtered all inhabitants in their tepees. When the Lakota braves returned they found that 300+ women and children had been slaughtered in their beds. This was given as one of the reasons that there was no mercy given to anyone in the battle of The Little Bighorn with the 7th Cavalry.
Another myth about the settlement of Oklahoma is disputed by the relocations cited as:
The Trail of Tears is a name given to the forced relocation and movement of Native American nations from southeastern parts of the United States following the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The removal included many members of the Cherokee, Muscogee (Creek), Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw nations, among others in the United States, from their homelands to Indian Territory in eastern sections of the present-day state of Oklahoma. The phrase originated from a description of the removal of the Choctaw Nation in 1831.
Many Native Americans suffered from exposure, disease and starvation on the route to their destinations. Many died, including 60,000 of the 130,000 relocated Cherokee, intermarried and accompanying European-Americans, and the 2,000 African-American free blacks and slaves owned by the Cherokee they took with them. European Americans and African American freedmen and slaves also participated in the Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee Creek and Seminole forced relocations.
In the late 1800′s two of the Seminole clans escaped from the Indian Territory and literally disappeared. One of those clans settled in Southwestern Missouri and became farmers and very productive members of that Wild West community. Of the members of that group that I, personally, know of included:
Farmers and ranchers throughout the areas in Northern Arkansas and Southwestern Missouri. One of which, because doctors and dentists wouldn’t treat them, pulled his own teeth with pliers. He also treated himself for gunshot wounds. When he needed to repair a fence he straightened the fingers of his hand that had been deformed by a gunshot but he needed to use it.
I have the flag that covered the casket of 2dLt. John Elgin Hughes, who was a pilot shot down over Italy in WW II.
Lt. Hughes’ brother, another uncle of mine, was a POW in France and was liberated during the D-Day invasion.
A cousin of theirs that died in a VA hospital in Little Rock, Arkansas because of what today would have been classified as PTSD. He was a bull dozer operator in WW II. His job was to dig and cover bodies for Graves Registration.
Two cousins of mine were soldiers in the Korean War. One was wounded and spent the remainder of his life with excruciating back pain.
As you can see: the Hollywood depiction of Native Americans is “just a little off”. I don’t believe any of this history will appear in the Common Core curricula.
I was told most of my life that the history of our people has been passed from generation to generation by “word of mouth” by the elders. I want to pass some of this history along to you, but in this case it will be in writing.
The Seminole Tribe of Florida bears a motto of never being defeated or signed a treaty with the United States of America. The Seminoles of Florida rightly own and operate lands completely governed by a Tribal Government. They provide their own police department, have schools that out perform the public schools of the state. The Tribe purchased Hard Rock Cafes and Casinos and turned the tribe into one of the richest in the world.
But we are here to talk about history:
The Seminole wars lasted for years and the attempt to destroy the tribe was led by many army generals and at least one President. The tribes knowledge of jungle warfare was the reason for the development of today’s guerrilla warfare tactics. Not only the jungle warfare tactics in the swamps and forests of the Southeast though, but the hit and run tactics if the plains tribes was very successful. So successful in fact that the Army had to resort to trickery to gain any victory as evidenced by the great warrior Osceola of the Seminole tribe.
Osceola’s capture, under a controversial flag of truce offered by Gen. Thomas Jessup, remains today one of the blackest marks in American military history. A larger-than-life character, Osceola is the subject of numerous myths; his 1838 death in a Charleston, S.C. prison was noted on front pages around the world. At the time of his death, Osceola was the most famous American Indian.
Another myth perpetrated by Hollywood is the taking of scalps by the plains tribes. This practice was learned from white Indian fighters in Texas. The “counting coupe” as described by Hollywood did not mean scalping of enemies. This practice was initially the mere touching the dead body of a fallen brave. It was believed that if you touched the body of a fallen enemy, his bravery and spirit would transfer to you.
In a particularly bloody battle in Northern Texas, several “Indians” were killed and the white mercenaries involved scalped the bodies to take back as proof for payment. Needless to say this incensed the warriors that returned to collect the bodies of their fallen comrades. So the practice was performed in retaliation in future raids.
If you get the chance, please go to the Sand Creek Battleground on Colorado. The history here is that portions of the 7th U. S. Cavalry had surrounded a settlement of “Indians” at Sand Creek just before dawn. At dawn the soldiers attacked before anyone was awake and slaughtered all inhabitants in their tepees. When the Lakota braves returned they found that 300+ women and children had been slaughtered in their beds. This was given as one of the reasons that there was no mercy given to anyone in the battle of The Little Bighorn with the 7th Cavalry.
Another myth about the settlement of Oklahoma is disputed by the relocations cited as:
The Trail of Tears is a name given to the forced relocation and movement of Native American nations from southeastern parts of the United States following the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The removal included many members of the Cherokee, Muscogee (Creek), Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw nations, among others in the United States, from their homelands to Indian Territory in eastern sections of the present-day state of Oklahoma. The phrase originated from a description of the removal of the Choctaw Nation in 1831.
Many Native Americans suffered from exposure, disease and starvation on the route to their destinations. Many died, including 60,000 of the 130,000 relocated Cherokee, intermarried and accompanying European-Americans, and the 2,000 African-American free blacks and slaves owned by the Cherokee they took with them. European Americans and African American freedmen and slaves also participated in the Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee Creek and Seminole forced relocations.
In the late 1800′s two of the Seminole clans escaped from the Indian Territory and literally disappeared. One of those clans settled in Southwestern Missouri and became farmers and very productive members of that Wild West community. Of the members of that group that I, personally, know of included:
Farmers and ranchers throughout the areas in Northern Arkansas and Southwestern Missouri. One of which, because doctors and dentists wouldn’t treat them, pulled his own teeth with pliers. He also treated himself for gunshot wounds. When he needed to repair a fence he straightened the fingers of his hand that had been deformed by a gunshot but he needed to use it.
I have the flag that covered the casket of 2dLt. John Elgin Hughes, who was a pilot shot down over Italy in WW II.
Lt. Hughes’ brother, another uncle of mine, was a POW in France and was liberated during the D-Day invasion.
A cousin of theirs that died in a VA hospital in Little Rock, Arkansas because of what today would have been classified as PTSD. He was a bull dozer operator in WW II. His job was to dig and cover bodies for Graves Registration.
Two cousins of mine were soldiers in the Korean War. One was wounded and spent the remainder of his life with excruciating back pain.
As you can see: the Hollywood depiction of Native Americans is “just a little off”. I don’t believe any of this history will appear in the Common Core curricula.
Saturday, August 24, 2013
Planning for Reality: Affordable Housing - Separating Fact from Fiction
Planning for Reality: Affordable Housing - Separating Fact from Fiction
Posted by Richard Hall ,
Affordable housing - fact vs fiction
I’m a supporter of affordable housing. It must be carefully planned so it’s appropriate, impact is identified and mitigated in advance and it should be done in a manner considerate of both new and existing residents. However Plan Bay Area’s very high housing targets, combined with urbanists and developers' desire for high density housing have created “the perfect storm” in Marin.
Lately I’ve seen many claims made by other affordable housing advocates, and I'd like to separate some of the facts from fiction. Before I do I want to disclose that I live in a single family home in an area designated (without my knowledge or buy-in) as a Priority Development Area. Given what we’ve seen with the Plan Bay Area ecosystem creating an echo chamber of supporting patrons it’s increasingly vital there’s transparency and disclosure of any possible conflicts of interest.
Disclosing Possible Conflicts of Interest
I understand that a document is being circulated by the Marin League of Women Voters on this topic – it seems appropriate for the league to disclose that their active member and past president, Judy Binsacca chairs the board of Ecumenical Housing, a non-profit with revenues of $95m, employing over 400 people and serving 6,500 housing units valued at over $1billion. I've learned that Judy was the primary author of this document. In the author's opinion, disclosure of such an association is important as readers weigh up the facts.
1) Affordable Housing Requires High Density Housing Near Transit: FALSE
Somehow high density transit oriented development and affordable housing have become intertwined. Some may argue that only with high densities can developers justify building. I don’t see enough scrutiny of this – but I’d like to learn more and I’m unconvinced this has been explored.
I do see a lot of opportunity to build affordable housing using second units and conversions of existing disused or under-utilized buildings. I’d also think it’s reasonable to have some high density housing in downtown San Rafael which is not adjacent and up against neighborhoods of single family home. I believe these opportunities are likely to be sufficient to meet all of Marin’s genuine needs.
It would appear that urbanists and the social equity affordable housing groups have banded together into a single, even more powerful fast-growth lobby. If we could separate these arguments we may be able to provide a reasonable amount of affordable housing without high density near transit.
The single biggest objection I have is how unfair it is to place the new residents in known, harmful locations. Placement near transit here in Marin means with ½ mile of highway 101. I’ve started to catalog all the studies chronicling why such placement is harmful:
Could there be an any more significant sign of bad planning?
2) We Must Build More Affordable Housing for the Workforce: FALSE
There is a frequently used premise that Marin should house its workforce. Does this mean San Francisco should accommodate its additional 265,291 in-commuters? (Source: US Census 2000).
The problem with this type of “sound bite”, sounds right statement is that it doesn’t reconcile realities. The realities are documented in a 1991 paper by Genevieve Guiliano of the UC Berkeley Transportation Center “Is Jobs-Housing Balance a Transportation Issue?” . Guiliano identifies the following reasons that there is no such causal link between work location and choice of proximate home location:
a) Living close to work is not a priority for many people. Instead people give preference to neighborhood quality, availability of parks , quality of schools, racial and ethnic mix, micro-climate.
b) Compared to housing costs commuting costs are small. Housing costs generally decline with distance from major employment centers, additional commuting costs can be traded off for cheaper housing. Thus many households choose to live in outlying areas, live in a larger house, and commute further to work.
c) Many households are multiple worker households. Living near one household member’s job may mean living far from another's.
d) Household mobility is high in the United States. Most people hold several different jobs over their working careers.
Guiliano concludes that even if the mix of residential units and commercial and industrial sites were somehow perfectly matched, and even if the resulting jobs base were perfectly matched with the resident workforce , the balance would likely be shortlived. Guliano states “The only way to guarantee workers live near their jobs would be to mandate the housing choices of workers” referencing 19th century factory towns.
Disclosing Possible Conflicts of Interest
I understand that a document is being circulated by the Marin League of Women Voters on this topic – it seems appropriate for the league to disclose that their active member and past president, Judy Binsacca chairs the board of Ecumenical Housing, a non-profit with revenues of $95m, employing over 400 people and serving 6,500 housing units valued at over $1billion. I've learned that Judy was the primary author of this document. In the author's opinion, disclosure of such an association is important as readers weigh up the facts.
1) Affordable Housing Requires High Density Housing Near Transit: FALSE
Somehow high density transit oriented development and affordable housing have become intertwined. Some may argue that only with high densities can developers justify building. I don’t see enough scrutiny of this – but I’d like to learn more and I’m unconvinced this has been explored.
I do see a lot of opportunity to build affordable housing using second units and conversions of existing disused or under-utilized buildings. I’d also think it’s reasonable to have some high density housing in downtown San Rafael which is not adjacent and up against neighborhoods of single family home. I believe these opportunities are likely to be sufficient to meet all of Marin’s genuine needs.
It would appear that urbanists and the social equity affordable housing groups have banded together into a single, even more powerful fast-growth lobby. If we could separate these arguments we may be able to provide a reasonable amount of affordable housing without high density near transit.
The single biggest objection I have is how unfair it is to place the new residents in known, harmful locations. Placement near transit here in Marin means with ½ mile of highway 101. I’ve started to catalog all the studies chronicling why such placement is harmful:
- Bay Area Air Quality Management District: CEQA Air Quality Guidelines – see table 5-2 on page 52, increase in cancer risk. For reference highway 101 carries over 188,000 vehicles per day so here in Marin we are practically off the chart (in the highest 100,000+ vehicle band)
- Yale University: Minorities Breathe Worse Air Pollution
- University of Southern California, LA: Traffic Pollution Tied to Autism Risk
- Children’s Hospital of Los Angles: Proximity to Freeways Increases Autism Risk
- The Sierra Club: How Highways and Roads Cause Health Problems
- Johns Hopkins: Effects of Distance from a Heavily Transited Avenue on Asthma in Peru
- Tufts: Community Assessment of Freeway Exposure and Health
- The World Health Organization: Health Risks of Particulate Matter from Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
Could there be an any more significant sign of bad planning?
2) We Must Build More Affordable Housing for the Workforce: FALSE
There is a frequently used premise that Marin should house its workforce. Does this mean San Francisco should accommodate its additional 265,291 in-commuters? (Source: US Census 2000).
The problem with this type of “sound bite”, sounds right statement is that it doesn’t reconcile realities. The realities are documented in a 1991 paper by Genevieve Guiliano of the UC Berkeley Transportation Center “Is Jobs-Housing Balance a Transportation Issue?” . Guiliano identifies the following reasons that there is no such causal link between work location and choice of proximate home location:
a) Living close to work is not a priority for many people. Instead people give preference to neighborhood quality, availability of parks , quality of schools, racial and ethnic mix, micro-climate.
b) Compared to housing costs commuting costs are small. Housing costs generally decline with distance from major employment centers, additional commuting costs can be traded off for cheaper housing. Thus many households choose to live in outlying areas, live in a larger house, and commute further to work.
c) Many households are multiple worker households. Living near one household member’s job may mean living far from another's.
d) Household mobility is high in the United States. Most people hold several different jobs over their working careers.
Guiliano concludes that even if the mix of residential units and commercial and industrial sites were somehow perfectly matched, and even if the resulting jobs base were perfectly matched with the resident workforce , the balance would likely be shortlived. Guliano states “The only way to guarantee workers live near their jobs would be to mandate the housing choices of workers” referencing 19th century factory towns.
Washington DC Public Schools promote the "Common Core"
Let's hope the Common Core helps the DC Public School system. It's teachers are among the nation's highest paid yet the schools have been among the lowest performing test scores and graduation rates. This video does not mention the 400 datapoints that will track every student throughout grades K-12.
Friday, August 23, 2013
Thursday, August 22, 2013
A public forum and discussion about the Common Core in Conejo , CA (Southern California)
Here is another video
(from a friend)...Haven't watched the full video yet, but it apparently has pros/cons.
Post from a friend: It's long, but very informative if you want to learn about Common Core both pro and con. If you can only watch part of it, watch the last hour and a half where they are taking questions from the parents and teachers in the audience. There is an excellent question at the 1:02 mark. Also listen to the very beginning so you understand the qualifications of the various speakers. If you can, listen to the entire thing. If you feel comfortable, feel free to post here on this thread what your thoughts are about all of this. At the 1:27 mark and on and off after that there is some discussion about the privacy protections that have been turned upside down.
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
What is the New "Common Core" and Why it is a Bad Idea.
Editor's Note: If you feel that the Federal Government is expanding in every area of your life, you are not alone. This year our Dixie School District students will be taught from a national standard called the "Common Core". Here is a discussion of what the common core is and why it is a bad idea. Let us know what you think. See the Marin IJ story HERE
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








